\nPractice facilities
\nThe amount of football practices
\nPractice length
\nHow you use the practice time (quality of the practice)
\nTraining equipment
\nCompetence
\nExperience
\nSupport round the team (ass. Coaches, goalie trainers, material management, doctors)<\/p>\n
Strengthen resources and skills<\/strong><\/h2>\nBuild up your resources and the individual skills of your players. A team with individual competent players will obviously have better opportunities compared with less skilled teams. In the team capacity you include physics, condition, fitness, speed, strength, body size, attitude, motivation, mental or psychological skills and coordination skills. Other categories are age, experience, education, gender and social status.
\nSupport round the team like assistant coaches, goalkeeping coaches, fitness trainers, physics, masseurs, doctors, sports scientist, sport psychologist etc.<\/p>\n
Manchester United for example has, a full time doctor, five physios, a fitness coach, a weights coach, an optometrist\u2026<\/p>\n
\u201cCaptains and coaches from all over the world considered that Mourinho got the best results with less resources than their rivals, but he has been rude and with no education in his behaviour to achieve his objectives.\u201d \/Franz Beckenbauer<\/p>\n
![\"Floorball](\"https:\/\/flrball.com\/drills\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/victory.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nTeam-spirit<\/strong> can be described in many ways, here some keywords:
\nHow well we know each other
\nStriving together towards a common goal
\nHonesty
\nLoyalty
\nPositivity
\nHumility
\nShowing that you are ready to do things for others (acting)
\nSolving problems together
\nGood communication
\nSupporting each other
\nEthics
\nMoral
\n1+1=3<\/p>\nCo-operational losses<\/strong> can be described as the opposite to team-spirit, but also as more practical losses during a practice or a game:
\nLack of\u2026
\n<\/strong>How you use the practice time (quality of the practice)
\nEquipment
\nCompetence
\nExperience
\nSupport round the team (ass. Coaches, goalie trainers)
\nCommon goals
\nHonesty
\nLoyalty
\nPositivity
\nHumility
\nSolving problems together
\nCommunication
\nSupporting each other
\nEthics
\nMoral
\nNorms<\/p>\n![\"Floorball](\"https:\/\/flrball.com\/drills\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/1vs2-1024x425.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nCo-operational losses<\/strong> can also be:
\nUndefined roles
\nBad passes
\nWrong positioning
\nBad performance\/errors during the drills on your practice
\nUnclear directives
\nWe and them thinking or me and you (in a negative way)
\nEgoistic behavior (in a negative way)<\/p>\nSmooth co-operation<\/strong><\/h2>\nGet the different groups in your team to work together smoothly, through for example the team set up (like e.g. 2-2-1) and with synchronizing defense and forwards. The composal of the floorball team is important in avoiding co-operational losses. To practice with the same speed and intensity as in a floorball game is obvious for every coach. In avoiding the social loafing part, you need to have clear roles, responsibilities and norms in your floorball team.<\/p>\n
Ringelmann study \u2013 Tug of war<\/strong><\/p>\nOne of the earliest studies in the area of co-operational losses and social loafing was done by Ringelmann. Ringelmann let people participate in a \u201ctug of war\u201d. He started to measure their individual capacity, which was defined as 100%. Then they did the exercise in pairs, with three people, four people and so on. The result showed that in pairs they reached 93% of their capacity, three people reached 85% of their individual capacity, 77% in a team of four and only 49% in a team of eight people.<\/p>\n
The tendency that peoples effort decreases in a larger group is sometimes called the \u201cRingelmann effect\u201d, he\u2019s study is supported with more recent studies (Ingham, Levinger, Graves & Peckham, 1974) This could explain why some star players sometimes are invisible during a game, they are waiting for the other players to perform and not counting their own low performance will be visible. It can also be the opposite, many of the team members take a step back and wait for the star player to win the game for the team. This type of social loafing will appear on all levels, in all ages and regardless of gender.<\/p>\n
Social loafing as a result from a red card?<\/strong><\/h2>\nSocial loafing can also be visible after a red card in a football game, the team with all players left feel they have an advantage and instead of continuing, they take a step back and feel comfortable, social loafing and the team with only ten players might feel they need to take greater responsibility and therefore the game might continue look like they play with even strength.<\/p>\n
With this prerequisites you should try to improve you capacity and team spirit and to reduce the co-operational losses.<\/p>\n
Easiest part to copy between floorball teams<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe easiest part to improve or at least get the right prerequisites from the beginning in big European football teams is probably the capacity block, and now I\u2019m talking about really big teams like Manchester United, Manchester City, Chelsea, Inter, Real Madrid, Bayern Munich etc. You can buy the players \u201cyou want\u201d, you have everything in place round the team, and this is the part that\u2019s also easiest to \u201ccopy\u201d between the teams.<\/p>\n
But unlimited money will not grant you success, there are many failures back in time with clubs getting a lot of money and unlimited resources to buy players, but the victories aren\u2019t still coming and then you have problems with other parts in this football leadership model, like team-spirit, co-operational losses, motivation or common goals\u2026<\/p>\n
I don\u2019t think Jos\u00e9 Mourinho had the best team regarding capacity in Inter 2010, of course he had world-class players, but not the best indivual players, some other teams had stronger names on the paper (e.g. Barcelona), but he mastered the other parts in leading the team in a briljant way. He was able to motivate the players, build up a strong team-spirit and reduce the co-operational losses and the result was there, three titles!<\/p>\n
\u201cIt is like having a blanket that is too small for the bed. You pull the blanket up to keep your chest warm and your feet stick out. I cannot buy a bigger blanket becuase the supermarket is closed. But I am content because the blanket is cashmere. It is no ordinary blanket.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\u201cWe are on top at the moment but not because of the club\u2019s financial power. We are in contention for a lot of trophies because of my hard work.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0 Jos\u00e9 Mourinho<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"This part is about predicting a floorball teams performance and possibility to deliver results. The Teamwork part consist of three blocks, capacity + team spirit \u2013 co-operational losses = team performance. In capacity you can put in: Practice facilities The … Continue reading
\nSupport round the team like assistant coaches, goalkeeping coaches, fitness trainers, physics, masseurs, doctors, sports scientist, sport psychologist etc.<\/p>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nTeam-spirit<\/strong> can be described in many ways, here some keywords: Co-operational losses<\/strong> can be described as the opposite to team-spirit, but also as more practical losses during a practice or a game: Co-operational losses<\/strong> can also be: Get the different groups in your team to work together smoothly, through for example the team set up (like e.g. 2-2-1) and with synchronizing defense and forwards. The composal of the floorball team is important in avoiding co-operational losses. To practice with the same speed and intensity as in a floorball game is obvious for every coach. In avoiding the social loafing part, you need to have clear roles, responsibilities and norms in your floorball team.<\/p>\n Ringelmann study \u2013 Tug of war<\/strong><\/p>\n One of the earliest studies in the area of co-operational losses and social loafing was done by Ringelmann. Ringelmann let people participate in a \u201ctug of war\u201d. He started to measure their individual capacity, which was defined as 100%. Then they did the exercise in pairs, with three people, four people and so on. The result showed that in pairs they reached 93% of their capacity, three people reached 85% of their individual capacity, 77% in a team of four and only 49% in a team of eight people.<\/p>\n The tendency that peoples effort decreases in a larger group is sometimes called the \u201cRingelmann effect\u201d, he\u2019s study is supported with more recent studies (Ingham, Levinger, Graves & Peckham, 1974) This could explain why some star players sometimes are invisible during a game, they are waiting for the other players to perform and not counting their own low performance will be visible. It can also be the opposite, many of the team members take a step back and wait for the star player to win the game for the team. This type of social loafing will appear on all levels, in all ages and regardless of gender.<\/p>\n Social loafing can also be visible after a red card in a football game, the team with all players left feel they have an advantage and instead of continuing, they take a step back and feel comfortable, social loafing and the team with only ten players might feel they need to take greater responsibility and therefore the game might continue look like they play with even strength.<\/p>\n With this prerequisites you should try to improve you capacity and team spirit and to reduce the co-operational losses.<\/p>\n The easiest part to improve or at least get the right prerequisites from the beginning in big European football teams is probably the capacity block, and now I\u2019m talking about really big teams like Manchester United, Manchester City, Chelsea, Inter, Real Madrid, Bayern Munich etc. You can buy the players \u201cyou want\u201d, you have everything in place round the team, and this is the part that\u2019s also easiest to \u201ccopy\u201d between the teams.<\/p>\n But unlimited money will not grant you success, there are many failures back in time with clubs getting a lot of money and unlimited resources to buy players, but the victories aren\u2019t still coming and then you have problems with other parts in this football leadership model, like team-spirit, co-operational losses, motivation or common goals\u2026<\/p>\n I don\u2019t think Jos\u00e9 Mourinho had the best team regarding capacity in Inter 2010, of course he had world-class players, but not the best indivual players, some other teams had stronger names on the paper (e.g. Barcelona), but he mastered the other parts in leading the team in a briljant way. He was able to motivate the players, build up a strong team-spirit and reduce the co-operational losses and the result was there, three titles!<\/p>\n \u201cIt is like having a blanket that is too small for the bed. You pull the blanket up to keep your chest warm and your feet stick out. I cannot buy a bigger blanket becuase the supermarket is closed. But I am content because the blanket is cashmere. It is no ordinary blanket.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n \u201cWe are on top at the moment but not because of the club\u2019s financial power. We are in contention for a lot of trophies because of my hard work.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0 Jos\u00e9 Mourinho<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" This part is about predicting a floorball teams performance and possibility to deliver results. The Teamwork part consist of three blocks, capacity + team spirit \u2013 co-operational losses = team performance. In capacity you can put in: Practice facilities The … Continue reading
\nHow well we know each other
\nStriving together towards a common goal
\nHonesty
\nLoyalty
\nPositivity
\nHumility
\nShowing that you are ready to do things for others (acting)
\nSolving problems together
\nGood communication
\nSupporting each other
\nEthics
\nMoral
\n1+1=3<\/p>\n
\nLack of\u2026
\n<\/strong>How you use the practice time (quality of the practice)
\nEquipment
\nCompetence
\nExperience
\nSupport round the team (ass. Coaches, goalie trainers)
\nCommon goals
\nHonesty
\nLoyalty
\nPositivity
\nHumility
\nSolving problems together
\nCommunication
\nSupporting each other
\nEthics
\nMoral
\nNorms<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n
\nUndefined roles
\nBad passes
\nWrong positioning
\nBad performance\/errors during the drills on your practice
\nUnclear directives
\nWe and them thinking or me and you (in a negative way)
\nEgoistic behavior (in a negative way)<\/p>\nSmooth co-operation<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Social loafing as a result from a red card?<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Easiest part to copy between floorball teams<\/strong><\/h2>\n